Timeline for Is there any moderation for users who cast counter-productive votes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Oct 26, 2014 at 17:21 | comment | added | fixer1234 | slhck beat me to it. There are a few people fixated on any use of a superlative (like simplest or fastest), as potentially attracting subjective answers and downvote or vote to close. This is even the case where there is a factual basis and known "best", so there actually is a legitimate superlative answer, or by the time they see the question, there are already good, factual answers so opinion answers would be discouraged. They also never bother to reverse their vote when the offending word is removed. Seagull style: fly in, crap on it, fly off. | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 12:05 | comment | added | slhck Mod | Well, I would have assumed that, given your initial question :) Do you have any specific suggestion as to what could be changed or should be handled differently? | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 10:17 | comment | added | Amazon Dies In Darkness | You undoubtedly spent quite a bit of your time writing that, so out of respect, I want to let you know that I read all of it, and appreciate your time and energy. I have mixed emotions and different thoughts about everything you said. | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 9:06 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |