Timeline for Time for [wake-up] to go back to [sleep]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | Robin Hood | I think they should both be kept. [sleep] has 722 questions so its a a point where it can afford sub-categories, and [wake-up] has 89 questions which suggests people are finding it a useful subcategory. I don't see the benefit of taking a step back, and making these questions harder to find among the hundreds of [sleep] questions. PS: Love the title btw. | |
| Nov 18, 2014 at 6:32 | comment | added | Robotnik | @fixer1234 - Whilst I agree that sleep states vs hibernation are pretty similar and could probably be lumped together, I, like Raystafarian feel a lot of people wouldn't be happy with that either, as they are two completely separate processes executed in different ways. | |
| Nov 18, 2014 at 6:30 | history | edited | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
much better title.. wish I thought of it 2 days ago
|
| Nov 17, 2014 at 15:49 | comment | added | Raystafarian | @fixer1234 I feel like the sleep vs hibernation can of worms isn't something we want to get into. | |
| Nov 16, 2014 at 9:12 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Go one better, how about [sleep-hibernation], which would include returning to action? Is there enough difference between sleep and hibernation that warrants both, and would the "ambiguity" be meaningful? | |
| Nov 16, 2014 at 9:00 | history | asked | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |