Timeline for Delete obsolete wiki'd question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Dec 20, 2014 at 17:16 | answer | added | Nemo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 13, 2014 at 12:51 | vote | accept | Nifle | ||
| Dec 13, 2014 at 12:49 | vote | accept | Nifle | ||
| Dec 13, 2014 at 12:50 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2014 at 11:53 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 19:22 | answer | added | Nifle | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 18:54 | comment | added | Ramhound | I think that was my point; I would agree the third option is the best in this case. | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 15:39 | comment | added | Nifle | @Ramhound - I personally would choose option 3. But going with option 1 we have to keep it updated as the wiki changes or it will be obsolete again next time OO comes with a new version. To "come up with our own answer" as you write, is a bit hard when the answer essentially is a list of file types. A compromise is option 2, the question can be found here on SU and we don't have to keep it's answer updated. The downside is that we have to break our own rule about "no link only answers". | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 11:56 | comment | added | Ramhound | How is the second option helpful? Anyone can do a Google search and find the wiki-page, so why make somebody go through another step ( finding this website then clicking a link ), doesn't seem helpful at all. We should be using the same sources the wiki-page used to come up with our own answer | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 17:22 | answer | added | Canadian Luke | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 17:14 | history | asked | Nifle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |