Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this questionvery similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should comment on allquixotic's question? Something else?

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should comment on allquixotic's question? Something else?

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should comment on allquixotic's question? Something else?

added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Josh
  • 175
  • 4

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should I edit or comment on the allquixotic's question? Something else?

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should I edit or comment on the allquixotic's question?

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should comment on allquixotic's question? Something else?

Source Link
Josh
  • 175
  • 4

I have a question very similar to an existing question, but different environments (Linux vs Windows). Re-ask or comment?

I have a question about forcing traffic all traffic to be routed over an encrypted connection (e.g., TLS) without using a VPN. It is very similar to this question, with the major difference being the server: I do not have a Linux server. Instead, I have a Windows box (currently Windows 8.1, but I can install any version, including Server OS's if necessary) that will act as the proxy server.

Is my question different enough that I should post another question? If not, should I edit or comment on the allquixotic's question?