Timeline for Unable to edit answer in review (audit)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 at 0:30 | comment | added | bfhd | I ran into the same problem - failing a review audit because I couldn't edit a deleted post. | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 20:37 | answer | added | Psycogeek | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 20:29 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Many of the audit "bad" examples are already deleted posts. | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 16:01 | comment | added | Sun | Why is no action not a valid action in that situation? If the question is deleted, why would I skip it make someone else review the post? | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 11:59 | comment | added | Ramhound | If the answer was deleted then you would have been safe to skip it. Why a deleted question was in the audit I cannot explain that but I just know the proper action wasn't "no action" | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 3:47 | comment | added | Sun | Which is why I clicked on edit (to take action). There was no answer to edit, I assumed it was deleted as the system message stated, and pressed no action. You're saying I should have skipped? No action seems like a valid response to me. | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 2:43 | comment | added | Ramhound | Unless you continuously fail, a singular failure, isn't that important. The reason you failed is because the answer wasn't a "no action" answer. | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 19:27 | comment | added | fixer1234 | That warning was still part of the test, to see what you would do next. You raised the problem here, which was the correct response, so you did actually pass the test. Now that audit is complete. :-) | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 19:24 | history | asked | Sun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |