Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

added 114 characters in body
Source Link
bwDraco
  • 46.4k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 52

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

added 15 characters in body
Source Link
bwDraco
  • 46.4k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 52

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Recently, I've noticed a trend towards spam postings that are free of any external link but advertise a product without disclosure. These techniques evade normal spam detection mechanisms and techniques by eliminating the link and relying on the reader to search for the program in question, but are nonetheless spam.

How do we effectively identify and respond to these posts?

Source Link
bwDraco
  • 46.4k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 52
Loading