Timeline for How much negative result is there to having some aggressive edit refusers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2015 at 5:07 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | First of all, I quibble with your terminology. The “rejection rate” of the middle user is under 36%. You should compute 71/(127+71). But, secondly, Reviewer Stats shows incorrect number of Suggested Edit rejections. My rejection rate is even higher (39%), and I suspect that most serious reviewers have similar statistics – there are a lot of really bad Suggested Edits. | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 11:03 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited. Dressed the naked link.
|
| Jan 24, 2015 at 1:01 | comment | added | killermist | I love that I've made enough of a name for myself that when I make edits, reviewers can notice that, "killermist did this, he's trying to help. He probably did something positive" (in general), especially since I make absolutely certain to point out in my comments what I did and why. Acting without reason kinda ain't in my behaviour profile. My meditation may be short, depending on task, but most of my actions are some form of premeditation made manifest. | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 7:59 | comment | added | Psycogeek | Ok then I should add that "balance" may very well be a good thing. That even in the supreme court(s) you have judges that reject change way more often, and judges that roll on through way more often, and together they make a total descision. | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 7:43 | comment | added | slhck Mod | This does not really address the question though. | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 6:16 | history | answered | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |