Timeline for Super User in Portuguese
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 at 8:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/ with https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:05 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.pt.stackoverflow.com/ with https://pt.meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 4, 2015 at 19:25 | answer | added | Victor Stafusa | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 4, 2015 at 16:56 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Patrick - I feel my comments are pretty clear. | |
| Mar 4, 2015 at 16:53 | comment | added | ptkato | @Ramhound, I really don't understand what you're trying to complain, it's quite simple, questions that are off-topic on SU, will be on-topic in SUpt because we (portuguese speakers community for StackExchange sites) doesn't have another sites that cover other subjects. Considering this, I can't see any trouble or confusion to the newcomers. | |
| Mar 4, 2015 at 9:18 | answer | added | jmacStaff | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 4, 2015 at 9:11 | comment | added | Jorge B. |
@Raystafarian SU!=SUpt as well SO!=SOpt. Like in the SOpt we define our rules. After all, are the users that define the on-topic and off-topic? Right?
|
|
| Mar 3, 2015 at 14:45 | history | edited | Victor Stafusa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
As requested, updating it
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 14:24 | comment | added | Raystafarian | I agree with @Ramhound, I'm not sure why something off-topic on SU would be on-topic at SU-P when they are both "SU" - it may become confusing to new(er) users and we already have enough confusion about on- vs off-topic. I understand the branding aspect, but I think that's something that may need to be sorted out by SE as a whole. | |
| Feb 26, 2015 at 2:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/570776193353568256 | ||
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:43 | comment | added | Maniero | @Ramhound But I understood the intention. Why not call it SuperUser? All those sites exist primarily for users ("normal" and professional users). SOpt includes P.SE, DBA (almost), TCS, Development for WP, Joomla, etc., scripting, CR, QA, Software security, and more. And it works very well. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:36 | comment | added | Ramhound | @bigown - I admit. I used a bad example. I think my point is why will this new localized site be called Superuser if its includes all the popular main but smaller websites? | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:25 | comment | added | Maniero | @Ramhound Sure :) Actually SO has more questions from P.SE topics than P.SE itself :) | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:22 | comment | added | Ramhound | @bigown - Lets be honest. I don't think anyone knows the reason why a question on Programmers isn't on topic at SO. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:21 | comment | added | Maniero | @Ramhound Programmers topics is on-topic on SOpt. We are more inclusive and we are happier because this :) I don't understand how Programmers is off at SOen. And I was moderator on Programmers. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:17 | comment | added | Math | Probably for the same reason the we have "StackOverflow em Português", and not "Estouro de Pilha". As bigown sad, it's the brand. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:16 | comment | added | Maniero | @ThatBrazilianGuy Probably because the branding but it's a good discussion. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:13 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Victor - If you are trying to come up with a Portuguese website to cover all those areas. Should it really be called Superuser instead of something else? It would be like putting programmers.stackexchange.com/ questions on Stackoverflow | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:12 | comment | added | That Brazilian Guy | "Super User em Português" souns quite weird to me. Why not "super usuário em português", or just "super usuário"? | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 16:04 | comment | added | Victor Stafusa | @Raystafarian In fact we expect that SU-Portuguese to eventually became larger than SO-Portuguese, since its scope is much more closer to end users. Further, its proposed current scope is somewhat larger than SU-English exactly because we can't fragment it in much smaller sites, so things that are on-topic on ServerFault, AskDifferent, AskUbuntu, etc are expected to be on-topic on SU-Portuguese. But anyway, even if your proportion does hold and we get 2K to 4K users with something like 200 avid users, that would still be nice. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 15:37 | comment | added | Raystafarian | Superuser has about 420K users (or accounts) while SO has 4.6M. The base for users for the SO-in-other-languages sites is huge. Given those numbers, SO-Portuguese is around 22K users. I can't see the SU site gathering enough momentum. Either way, I don't speak Portuguese, so I'm just leaving an opinion. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:32 | comment | added | Maniero | @JourneymanGeek 1) probably who speaks portuguese here can help flagging it. 2) The SE team doesn't want create several portuguese sites so SUpt is more broad. It's SU+SF+WebApps+Ubuntu+U&L+Apple+Android. Everything about software and hardware is on there. Actually evething is welcome seems to be new slogan for SE. My English is poor but this can help understand SUpt: discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/19807/… I know, is too broad, but we need to start with this scope and see what happen. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:27 | comment | added | Victor Stafusa | @JourneymanGeek About your item 2, I can't speak for others and most of the organizational details can only be decided in early beta. But taking StackOverflow in Portuguese as an example, the practices will be heavily inspired in SU, but it is likely that there will be some important differences. For the item 1, this is very rarely of any concern in practice. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:19 | history | edited | Victor Stafusa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar
|
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:10 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I for one have no arguments for or against this. If your site does get out of beta, I do wonder a few things 1) How do us non Portuguese speaking SU mods and high ranking users know when a question ought to be punted over to your site? We won't be able to know anything past "Google says its portugese" 2) Will you guys be adopting community best practices from SU or branching off on its own? | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:02 | history | asked | Victor Stafusa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |