Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Is questioning the claims of not uncommon software like Spinrite, off topic? If so, Why?

It's not uncommon, and proof of that is that immediately on asking it, a commenter that uses it replied. And the website grc.com shields up is quote a popular online port scanner so it is far from an unknown website

http://superuser.com/questions/894089/does-steve-gibsons-spinrite-remove-the-need-for-backups/894091#894091https://superuser.com/questions/894089/does-steve-gibsons-spinrite-remove-the-need-for-backups/894091#894091

Is questioning the claims of not uncommon software like Spinrite, off topic? If so, Why?

It's not uncommon, and proof of that is that immediately on asking it, a commenter that uses it replied. And the website grc.com shields up is quote a popular online port scanner so it is far from an unknown website

http://superuser.com/questions/894089/does-steve-gibsons-spinrite-remove-the-need-for-backups/894091#894091

Is questioning the claims of not uncommon software like Spinrite, off topic? If so, Why?

It's not uncommon, and proof of that is that immediately on asking it, a commenter that uses it replied. And the website grc.com shields up is quote a popular online port scanner so it is far from an unknown website

https://superuser.com/questions/894089/does-steve-gibsons-spinrite-remove-the-need-for-backups/894091#894091

Source Link
barlop
  • 24.7k
  • 14
  • 9

Is questioning the claims of not uncommon software like Spinrite, off topic?

Is questioning the claims of not uncommon software like Spinrite, off topic? If so, Why?

It's not uncommon, and proof of that is that immediately on asking it, a commenter that uses it replied. And the website grc.com shields up is quote a popular online port scanner so it is far from an unknown website

http://superuser.com/questions/894089/does-steve-gibsons-spinrite-remove-the-need-for-backups/894091#894091