Timeline for How do we handle duplicate answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 3, 2015 at 12:20 | history | edited | randomMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 31, 2015 at 21:28 | vote | accept | James Mertz | ||
| Mar 31, 2015 at 21:00 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 19:44 | comment | added | James Mertz | @slhck In this specific case, the other post is more of a question. I read it as more asking for clarification rather than attempting to answer the problem at hand. I see now and agree with you that low quality, but still applicable answers shouldn't be deleted. | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 19:35 | comment | added | slhck Mod | Moderators should not judge the technical quality of a post. If it looks like an acceptable answer then it's not worth deleting it. Especially not if it was posted before yours. (This could be interpreted as trying to remove competition. Which I understand you're not trying to do, but we wouldn't want to make a precedent case.) | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 18:41 | history | asked | James Mertz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |