Timeline for Deleting answer bug on FireFox mobile
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2015 at 5:01 | comment | added | Dave | Jon, OK you are right! I no longer see the spam message, I see what I would expect now so yes, all resolved. Thank you | |
| May 11, 2015 at 23:44 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'd actually gotten a spammer to guilt delete before. If you you can master that level of snark, they are never coming back. If they self delete excessively, they're going to hit a robo-suspension anyway | |
| May 11, 2015 at 21:15 | comment | added | Jon Ericson Staff | @Dave: Do you still see the message on mobile? Now that the spam flag has been invalidated, it shouldn't show up at all. I think the difference is that the notice is a lot bigger relative to the rest of the page on mobile. (To be honest, I've never seen the notice at all, so it might not exist on the full page.) | |
| May 11, 2015 at 19:18 | comment | added | Dave | I think I have to disagree, unless I missunderstood which is very likely :) I tested my post between the desktop version and mobile version. The desktop was fine, the issue was only on the mobile site | |
| May 11, 2015 at 18:40 | comment | added | Jon Ericson Staff | @Mokubai: We talked about that internally and this is our main concern. We're going to look into it further, but I don't think most actual spammers would hit on this strategy. Also: xkcd.com/810 | |
| May 11, 2015 at 18:30 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | But then what would happen if we manage to guilt a real spammer into deleting their own post, which I'm sure we've managed before... Surely the spam flag should be validated in that case? | |
| May 11, 2015 at 18:04 | history | answered | Jon EricsonStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |