Skip to main content

Timeline for Bad review audit question?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
Jun 17, 2015 at 14:08 comment added DavidPostill Mod @Ramhound Good one ... ;)
Jun 17, 2015 at 14:05 comment added Ramhound @DavidPostill - This review made me laugh...talking about bad review audits.
Jun 16, 2015 at 14:12 comment added DavidPostill Mod @fixer the bot is not always right, there is evidence of many bad review questions ... ;) And it has two close votes. Let's see what happens ...
Jun 16, 2015 at 14:06 comment added fixer1234 "Opinion based" implies that there would be differences of opinion. Some of the wording is typical of what would be associated with an opinion based question, but the question, itself, is easily supportable by facts that point to a single conclusion. Of course, that's all irrelevant. The reason it should not be closed is that it got 1,200 views. 12 upvotes, 2 favorites, and 2 highly upvoted answers, all within the last few weeks, so this isn't a stone age question from when the site had different standards. Bot logic is that it must be good. You wanna argue with a bot?
Jun 16, 2015 at 10:45 history edited DavidPostillMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 205 characters in body
Jun 16, 2015 at 10:43 comment added DavidPostill Mod @Ramhound I've voted to close. I wonder whether that will remove the question from review audits?
Jun 16, 2015 at 10:41 comment added Ramhound Based on the answers it recieved I would have also choosen to close it also.
Jun 16, 2015 at 8:12 history edited DavidPostillMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 119 characters in body
Jun 16, 2015 at 8:04 history asked DavidPostillMod CC BY-SA 3.0