21

The tag serves no purpose. Can we please burninate?

3
  • 4
    Yes, please! :D
    – Oliver Salzburg Mod
    Commented Apr 3, 2013 at 22:39
  • 7
    [peripherals] might be another one. Or [accessories]
    – Daniel Beck Mod
    Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 6:45
  • 1
    [devices] covers internal hardware also... [peripherals] and or [accessories] does not!
    – HaydnWVN
    Commented Apr 16, 2013 at 9:17

1 Answer 1

1

I object. There must be separate tags: one for internal hardware and another one for pluggable hardware: printers, home routers, whatever. Someone would want to subscribe to one, not another. To have a separate tag for any device would make too many of them. [Peripherals] may be good replacement, but just dropping the [device] tag would loose the information and automatic renaming would bring confusion. Just leave it be.

7
  • 5
    We already have individual tags for printer, scanner, mouse, keyboard, trackpad, usb-hub, docking-station, external-hard-drive, usb-flash-drive, mobile-phone, modem, dongle, monitor, nas, router, wireless-router, wireless-access-point... and probably a lot more I didn't find just now. How is devices more useful, or as useful, as the more specific alternatives? How do you suggest the tag be used? Is it actually used that way?
    – Daniel Beck Mod
    Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 6:47
  • In pair with individual tag. If I am skilled in that sort of devices, I would like to browse questions on them all, not one by one. On StackOverflow we have tags like [Java] [Python], not only [function] [class] [inheritance]. As long as no hierarhy of tags supported, we should have global and more specific tags side-by-side. By saying this I presume tags are intended to find questions one can answer, not just to omit stating your OS in question text. Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 7:53
  • 8
    Isn't device is the equivalent to programming-language (as opposed to e.g. framework?). python is more like printer...
    – Daniel Beck Mod
    Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 8:08
  • 2
    device is so broad it is useless. A programming-language tag is more akin to naming your operating system or architecture, which is actually useful and will be relevant to answering the question.
    – Amicable
    Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 10:10
  • So, if I am adept at tinkering all sorts of office appliances (as any small office IT-manager), what tags should I browse to see where I can provide assistance? All of the mentioned tags? What I say is that there must be tag that encompasses all specific tags, like [printer] or [mouse]. Commented Apr 8, 2013 at 11:14
  • @BarafuAlbino I don't think that's how tags work. If you browse device, you will only get questions that are explicitly tagged device, not printer or mouse.
    – Mike Caron
    Commented Apr 12, 2013 at 23:43
  • [devices] can also refer to mobile devices, such as the iPhone, so [peripherals] wouldn't cover it.
    – Ky -
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 2:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .