It seems kinda redundant to have booting and boot separate; although one is a verb and one is a noun, it seems like it would be simpler to keep them under one tag (for organization's sake).
I'm suggesting bootup (3) & booting (49) -> boot (343)
Done.
[multi-boot] and [dual-boot] also need to be merged, but I'm not sure which one needs to be kept.
Much like the more-than-one-monitor tags ([dual-monitors] and [multiple-monitors], which were merged into [multiple-monitors]), we really don't need two different tags for the concept of "more than one". I think [multiple-monitors] works pretty well, and I'd prefer to keep [multi-boot] as the more general term. But I'm afraid [dual-boot] is more common and more widely-known.
[multi-boot]
and [dual-boot]
should be kept separated? To me, [multi-boot]
refers to 3+ bootable OSes. [dual-boot]
is by far more common both in term and function. There are only 3 questions tagged with both, so it may be a pretty quick cleanup.
[dual-boot]
should be auto-corrected to [multi-boot]
so users don't have to think about it. For now, I'd support the moving of [dual-boot]
to [multi-boot]
. The prefix multi- means more than one, and dual- means two. Last time I checked, 2 < 1
. My 2¢
2 > 1
. remember, the alligator eats the bigger number first.
[dual-boot]
out of the system if they're merged now. Also, LOL -- I thought I was the only one who was taught the alligator method for > and <.