A while back, I asked a question about how the Raspberry Pi compares, but it was closed as "Not Constructive". I don't see how. I'll break it down:

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit in our Q&A format.

Huh. Why?

We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise,

Ummm. What? It's a comparison question. I'm asking for stats. Unless I'm an idiot, stats are facts.

but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

How? I'm not asking which is better. I'm asking how they compare.

If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.

It looks good to me. That's why I asked.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit your question or leave a comment.

It already fits the rules from what I can tell!

Can anyone shed some light here?