Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
15
votes
Accepted
How is my edit not considered an improvement?
As suggested by fixer1234 in the comments here, it appears that the original answerer wanted to make a direct quotation of his source without editing or improving it at all. I for one can see the valu …
19
votes
Should users suggest technical edits?
Imagine how bad Wikipedia would be if original article authors always rejected or rolled back helpful, correct edits made by contributors. It's amusing but sad to think of an equivalent to SE answers …
4
votes
Question closed and Edit suggestion rejected
Your edit certainly makes the question clearer and more answerable, but it's not certain that the OP intended to mean what you wrote.
You're assuming they're entering a list of items sequentially by …
5
votes
Warn when Approving Edits for Questions On-Hold
From my edit to this answer:
If a question is on hold and the suggested edit does not completely resolve the reason for the question being put on hold, you should Reject the edit.
This is a guidelin …
12
votes
Accepted
Should somewhat trivial edits be rejected if there are a lot of them coming from the same user?
Very minor edits are often frowned upon because they don't do "enough", but as long as they improve the post somewhat, I never understood why they are problematic for anything but the most significant …
7
votes
Should there be a limit to the % change to an original post by anonymous edits?
A few points:
On SE, we don't have anything against "anonymous users". We believe that users' contributions should be accepted optimistically, unless we have a specific reason to suspect a particula …