Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with close-reasons
Search options not deleted
user 167207
Questions about reasons for closing a specific question (use [specific-question] too), and the predefined reasons users are able to choose from when voting to close
0
votes
What close reason to use for "Unable to Reproduce"?
My question is, what is the Super User equivalent to Stack Overflow's Unable to Reproduce? Or should we use a custom close reason? Or maybe something else?
While I appreciate the specificity of b …
- 56.8k
3
votes
Allow migration of suitable hardware questions to the Hardware Recommendations Stack site
9-ish years later, and I am revisiting this…
Oftentimes I leave a fairly generic comment, via “Other - add a comment”, as follows:
“I’m voting to close this question because it is better suited for t …
- 56.8k
5
votes
What details do you need? Or please stop voting to close as “Needs details or clarity”!
I agree with this; even if it reads like a rant to me.
If you can’t provide a comment explaining what details are needed, the flag should not be used.
I often use “Needs details or clarity” and I hone …
- 56.8k