Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with review-audits
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 24010
Test items in review queues that are designed to help new reviewers hone their moderation skills, while nudging more experienced users that don't seem to be paying close attention to what they're reviewing.
2
votes
Accepted
Why did I fail this review audit?
It could be improved quite a bit. The formatting could be changed to a list. Proper punctuation could be added. Proper capitalization could be added.
That's an example of a low-quality answer.
- 24.5k
3
votes
Accepted
Failed audit trying to report apparent bug in review queue
Don't worry about one or two failed audits. As previous questions and answers have stated, they worked on you - You took a moment to check that the post is actually OK. You're not a robo-reviewer just …
- 24.5k
1
vote
TIL: Answering 10 minutes after a question is asked is "late."
The answer was posted at 16:57, then converted to a comment. Regardless...
The point of the Audits are to make sure you're actually reading the questions, and looking for clues. You've done that, so …
- 24.5k