Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with editing
Search options not deleted
user 380318
Anything related to the editing feature, e.g. anonymous edits, suggested edits, the editing privilege, edit history, etc.
3
votes
Bizarre rejection of edit on case pressure
The "reject" reviewers cast that vote almost certainly because your edits changed the meaning of the answer. That is, they would have affected the technical correctness of the post (for better or for …
- 41.7k
5
votes
Further peer review required for edit
Here's the Suggested Edits review task, for anyone interested.
Your changes were good, but they didn't go far enough. Specifically, you left code-like stuff (file paths and commands) italicized, whic …
- 41.7k
14
votes
Accepted
Did I create, then fail my own review audit?
Questions can be pushed into the Reopen Votes queue either by an edit or a reopen vote. As you said, the only revisions were made by you after you saw the review item, so that couldn't have created th …
- 41.7k
7
votes
OP edits the question himself instead of accepting a suggested edit.
Here's the review item. The post is deleted now, so I'll show the results pane here:
The edit was automatically rejected with no direct reviewer interaction. If it had been explicitly reviewed from …
- 41.7k