Search Results

I'd say, let's wait until the team has reviewed our /review stats generated through the new system and then decides to give us more (or even less) votes. …

Three other users see it in the Review queue and decide to close it. The question now has four close votes. A moderator clicks "Leave Open" in the queue. … By adding a binding vote for moderators, the Review process can be "corrected". A moderator can never just cancel votes. The only way to do that is to close the question and then reopen it. …

If you're talking about the initial revision of this post, it should have been recommended for deletion. It does not even contain a full sentence. Of course, the bad answers are just symptoms of (pos …

The reputation requirement was raised to combat some of the bad reviews happening with unexperienced users taking part in the queues. If you want the full background info, see this Meta Stack Overflo …

do I reject because the entire question should die a slow painful death? That wouldn't be the reason to reject. I mean, we don't want the question to "die" or however you may call it — we just do …

If <kbd> is the only thing a user is adding to a post, reject. Adding keyboard markup does not improve the post in any way—okay, it's nice to look at, but you can safely assume that a reader will know …

If you're thinking about when the question was asked, then you're already thinking about that post more than the typical review robot we're trying to catch does. … But I agree that the small number of review items at any given time will make people realize that audits are coming. It's usually the case for me when I review suggested edits. …

If you can identify which post (question or another answer) the "answer" should be made a comment on, then it's best if you raise a custom flag, saying: this should be a comment on https://superus …

They aren't actively "pushed" to your inbox. The only way to find out if an edit suggestion was accepted or rejected is to: Check your reputation Check your activity This applies to both approved …

We should be doing our best to avoid letting users pass with "Here's some code, go figure" answers. These should all still reside in the "low quality" queue, and actually, we should be more active as …

This means that moderators get to review edits much more often than regular users, and so they also get more review audits. … All in all, I'd be not inclined to ask for the number of review tests to be lowered—quite the contrary. …