revised
Ideas for celebrating Super User's 2nd anniversary
added 53 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Do we care about edit flooding? Should we be doing anything?
added 133 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
revised
Calculating accept rate
added 61 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Clarification of on-topic status
Sounds like a complaint here too, since he jumped to "flag weight" in there.
revised
Calculating accept rate
added 64 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Calculating accept rate
Which is why I put it as an answer so the question could be finished.
answered
Loading…
comment
Top Questions of the Week #25
No problem, thanks @nhinkle, had a great time writing it!
comment
Top Questions of the Week #25
I just did it... Was awesomely fun.
comment
Top Questions of the Week #25
@nhinkle Oh the horror.. Going to install Fedora right now to test it out ;)
answered
Loading…
comment
Top Questions of the Week #24
@Ivo Unfortunately no, I've got no intention of doing so. However, after taking a more serious look at my GPU, I think I could test it using Folding@home stuff. I'm testing it as we speak to see what I can manage :)
awarded
comment
Should non-substantial edits be approved or rejected?
@Ivo I think its very questionable, but this certain edit in particular seems almost.... Well, just not very productive when so much else was found to be edited.
answered
Loading…
comment
Top Questions of the Week #24
Great one, I remember the first time I ever defragged and wondered why I had such a big boost too.
comment
Should non-substantial edits be approved or rejected?
It actually somewhat bothers me to see just a single letter changed like that...we work hard for our rep, and someone is getting a +2 for changing a single letter. I think it should be discouraged, and we should be pointing out other ways to the user that they could have improved the post.