Skip to main content
deleted 107 characters in body
Source Link

Maybe. Yes,There has been no community consensus as of this revision of this answer and it will be; thus there should not have been any mass-retagging (not yet, anyway).

There were 60That said, there are currently 4 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 1. and together fit 47 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tagdown from 60); fit 6, fit 1, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2. They are as follows:

These ones areTwo about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one isOne about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

The network has rejected my retagging-only edit to the remaining question for some odd reason. One about the on-filesystem location of signature-related configuration for Microsoft Outlook:

Yes, and it will be.

There were 60 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 1. and together fit 47 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tag); fit 6, fit 1, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2.

These ones are about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one is about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

The network has rejected my retagging-only edit to the remaining question for some odd reason.

Maybe. There has been no community consensus as of this revision of this answer; thus there should not have been any mass-retagging (not yet, anyway).

That said, there are currently 4 questions tagged (down from 60). They are as follows:

Two about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

One about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

One about the on-filesystem location of signature-related configuration for Microsoft Outlook:

updated the stats and list to reflect recent retaggings
Source Link

Yes. It should,, and I'm on it. On a completely unrelated note, the edit queue is currently full will be.

There were 60 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 131. and together fit 4147 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tag); fit 36, fit 1, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2.

This one isThese ones are about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one is about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

The network has rejected my retagging-only edit to the remaining question for some odd reason.

Yes. It should, and I'm on it. On a completely unrelated note, the edit queue is currently full.

There were 60 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 13. and fit 41 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tag); fit 3, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2.

This one is about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one is about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

Yes, and it will be.

There were 60 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 1. and together fit 47 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tag); fit 6, fit 1, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2.

These ones are about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one is about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature:

The network has rejected my retagging-only edit to the remaining question for some odd reason.

Source Link

Yes. It should, and I'm on it. On a completely unrelated note, the edit queue is currently full.

There were 60 questions tagged when I started. When my edits go through, there should be 13. and fit 41 of them (some already had the relevant more-specific tag); fit 3, fit 1, and I'm not sure what to do with the following 2.

This one is about using handwritten signatures in digital documents:

This one is about using a static image (an “image signature”) as a form of signature analoguous to a handwritten signature: