Timeline for Gaming the review queue audits
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2016 at 21:18 | vote | accept | Karu | ||
| Mar 26, 2016 at 16:54 | comment | added | Hennes | The ` and then read the question before confirming` part is essential. But the first part is almost reflex memory. Slow? Must be a review. Type in reject and then read to make sure it actually is a review. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 16:07 | comment | added | TOOGAM | @Hennes How awful. If Superuser changes behavior, and slows on a good edit, you could reject a quality edit. Even worse: your description of "review question" may look like a command, as if review is a verb and not an adjective. However, your job was to review the question. It seems you're rejecting an improvement with a comment that whoever reads your description should perform the work that you volunteered to take on. If you paste in a standard reply of "reason: this is a review question", that would at least be more clear about your reasoning. | |
| Mar 25, 2016 at 13:13 | comment | added | Hennes | I think the slow thing happens with all queu's. If it is damn slow I will click reject, enter as comment 'reason: review question' and then read the question before confirming. | |
| Mar 23, 2016 at 1:23 | comment | added | Ben N | @Jonno That's definitely a phenomenon in the Suggested Edits queue. I haven't noticed it in the others, but it might be there. | |
| Mar 22, 2016 at 18:39 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @Jonno it's not just you | |
| Mar 22, 2016 at 16:48 | comment | added | Jonno | I'm not sure if it's just my connection or something, but the audits for me seem to take a few seconds to load where as a legit review takes a second tops. I immediately realise I'm being tested by that delay. | |
| Mar 22, 2016 at 16:35 | comment | added | Ramhound | If you are not sure, hit skip, instead of no action. This way the correct, since you don't know what the correct action is, somebody else who does can handle it. | |
| Mar 22, 2016 at 16:13 | comment | added | Karu | I never really considered that this was intentional, but it makes sense when you put it that way. I think I've got 4 failures on record, and every single one of them was an example of either "Eh.. I'm not sure, I'll say no action" or not paying enough attention and clicking the wrong vote button. I still think it would be nice if you had to hit "Done" before the audit is passed or failed though. | |
| Mar 22, 2016 at 16:09 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |