Timeline for please review hold on my blocker question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 26, 2016 at 21:09 | answer | added | Ben N | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | Ramhound | Question is still out of scope. There are better venues for this type of question, Superuser, really isn't it | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 14:46 | comment | added | random Mod | That's not what Catch-22 is | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 13:46 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | David says it's too broad, not too detailed.. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 13:31 | comment | added | Foo Bar | David, thanks, but your concerns (first too vague, now too detailed) sound a lot like Catch 22. Can you suggest a way to phrase my question that would be acceptable? | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 13:27 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | Your revised question is too broad. It is asking us (unpaid volunteers) to do a lot of work for you. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 12:56 | history | asked | Foo Bar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |