Timeline for Surge of one-point-profiles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 19:25 | comment | added | David W | I would agree with that "observational" sentiment regarding a perceived "surge" in questions from 1-point users. I thought I was just seeing things. I've gotten to the point I just ignore them. | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 16:03 | comment | added | Jan Doggen | So far the answers fail to address the surge mentioned in the title? Is this indeed the case? | |
| Nov 6, 2016 at 15:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/795291322261315585 | ||
| Nov 1, 2016 at 16:52 | vote | accept | DrNoone | ||
| Nov 1, 2016 at 5:07 | comment | added | user7783780 | probably new people came here from search engines | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 17:45 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: 13 | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 14:33 | answer | added | Burgi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 14:29 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod | Questions with many follow up questions are usually low quality or qualify as "unclear what you're asking". Thus, they should be closed. You can also downvote them to spare others the waste of time looking at them. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 14:19 | history | asked | DrNoone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |