Timeline for 2017 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2017 at 13:30 | comment | added | studiohack Mod | As @JourneymanGeek said, being able to constructively go about this is a sure sign of a more mature moderator. | |
| Mar 13, 2017 at 14:59 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | In a sense, one of the good things about having new mods is a fresh set of eyes. If someone can constructively go "Hey, we can do this better" and they're right, they'll likely be a better fit as a mod. | |
| Mar 10, 2017 at 13:59 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod | I think it's a great question. Especially coming from another moderator. | |
| Mar 10, 2017 at 12:20 | comment | added | terdon | Doesn't this presuppose the existence of a flaw? And are you sure it would be helpful to have candidates bashing the existing tem (as I fear would be likely with this question)? | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 6:07 | history | answered | randomMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |