Timeline for Why was this question closed as "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 20, 2017 at 15:10 | history | edited | Franck Dernoncourt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 16:37 | comment | added | JohnP | @unforgettableid - Health also deems it off topic. The base question to ask would be "Would an answer to this question affect/improve the health of an individual or a cohort". In this case there is no way to stretch this to be applicable, it's about software compatibility. Just because it is used in the health industry doesn't automatically mean it's on topic at health. | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 3:03 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @unforgettableid Good point, let's see what Health SE says: What is our stance on questions on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems? | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 3:00 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @unforgettableid also different language models. | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 18:08 | answer | added | music2myear | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 17:11 | comment | added | unforgettableidSupportsMonica | I theorize that Dragon Professional Individual may include a dictionary, and this dictionary may lack medical jargon. You might have to add all your favorite jargon slowly, one word at a time. This might take tons of time. You could buy Dragon Professional Individual, try it, and see how well it works for you. But I'm not sure whether or not Nuance do refunds. | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 17:09 | comment | added | unforgettableidSupportsMonica | You could try reposting to Health SE. Tag your question carefully, maybe with some "Technology" tag and some "EMR" tag, in hopes that some doctor will see it. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 20:43 | answer | added | PopsStaff | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 20:09 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @Mokubai You are making many guesses. Question closure shouldn't be based on guesses. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 20:04 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Because the compiled code could be encrypted, or at the very least compressed, meaning you have no way to easily grep it for EMR system names (even if names are used) so you have to literally rub the software against every EMR system you can. Having the code is as near as makes no odds completely useless for working out what it will and won't work on. They might blacklist it or they might not, and it could just work with every software there is, but if someone dies because you used it with an EMR system and it mistyped something they'll just look at you blankly and say "Yeah, and?" | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 19:51 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @Mokubai "which falls back to attempting to use it with every type of EMR system" why? | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 19:47 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Which falls back to attempting to use it with every type of EMR system you can find, which means you end up with a stupid list of answers saying "it worked with my one" as I mentioned already. Or you buy the version that they are happy for you to use with the systems and they tell you where it will work. They've precluded you using the normal version with those systems and told you what to do if you want support, your question is a moot point. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 19:43 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @Mokubai compiled version of it. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 19:43 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | @FranckDernoncourt Do you have access to their code? | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 19:42 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @Mokubai No you can find the info in the released program. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 16:05 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
proper format
|
| Mar 27, 2017 at 15:49 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | As pointed out by @bwDraco there is a simple answer to your question: "All of them. It is explicitly forbidden by the terms of their licence." If anything this would be closed for similar reasons to hackintosh questions, you are using the software in an unsupported and unlicenced manner and as such you are on your own with it. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 15:46 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | The only people who can definitively answer the question is Dragon. It is up to them to list which items are specifically supported or not and anything else is just going to be a nearly pointless list of "I tried it with X and it worked" which makes for a very bad set of answers. If you asked where to find such a list then that would definitely be off topic for the reason stated but I think you are skirting the lines as it is. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 15:45 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Questions about listing product features or limitations are typically closed as product recommendation requests (closest standard reason). It's similar to purchase support information. The answers tend to become obsolete as soon as the next version of the software comes out. How to use or solve a problem with an existing feature is more the intended scope. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 15:33 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 15:31 | history | asked | Franck Dernoncourt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |