Timeline for Failed a few tests recently for reasons that fail
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:58 | comment | added | music2myear | True. Just chalk this up to one more (slightly but not really) frustrated user. | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:20 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | In all fairness though, the audits are an automated system and it is difficult to create anything more than simple rules that will apply across the network. The rules for selection of audits have to be applicable to most sites and so occasionally people will fall afoul of those rules. It's a sad fact, but not really a problem unless you persistently fail every audit, in which case the system will be doing its job. | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:15 | comment | added | music2myear | I apply an automatic +20% softening to answers from people with diamonds. No worries. :) | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:12 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Yes, it is a nice picture. Many an Old God would have loved to be able to create that level of mental anguish with just one simple image. (sorry for the harsh tone in the answer) | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:10 | comment | added | music2myear | But seriously, while this specific case is admittedly not the best example, in most cases I think the audit bot should interpret the votes and flags and ignore the comments. For instance, if a post is less than a couple days old, has no comments, and needs improvement, I don't flag, I comment with direction. Only once direction has been ignored will I vote to close or flag. In mucking with times and comments to frame the situation, the audit bot throws this math off for me. | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:06 | comment | added | music2myear | Nice picture? NICE picture? That awoke carefully repressed memories and right now I'm still trying to convince my boss I need a binky and a blanket! | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 16:51 | history | answered | MokubaiMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |