Timeline for Question in close queue is marked as duplicate, but the duplicate is terrible!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 12, 2017 at 15:02 | vote | accept | Wes Sayeed | ||
May 12, 2017 at 15:02 | vote | accept | Wes Sayeed | ||
May 12, 2017 at 15:02 | |||||
May 12, 2017 at 13:40 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | So is your question essentially "should we endeavor to point toward the best quality duplicate available?" ...perhaps, even if that means going back and reversing previous closures? | |
May 11, 2017 at 22:47 | comment | added | G-Man Says 'Reinstate Monica' | It’s worth noting that the new question was flagged as a duplicate of the old question by the author of the old question. Apparently he took the closing of his question as a personal affront; as a punch to the face. | |
May 11, 2017 at 5:45 | answer | added | Astara | timeline score: 4 | |
May 11, 2017 at 0:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/862465508137947136 | ||
May 10, 2017 at 17:26 | answer | added | music2myear | timeline score: 9 | |
May 6, 2017 at 21:14 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Besides answer quality, the newer question includes the issue of "killer USB drives", which the old one does not. That's a useful consideration for readers landing on one question or the other, a good reason to make the older question a duplicate of the newer one. | |
May 6, 2017 at 16:08 | comment | added | Ramhound | Nothing prevents us from closing a question asked yesterday as a duplicate of a question asked today. | |
May 5, 2017 at 22:02 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | I closed the older one as a duplicate of the newer one - which is not a problem if the the newer one has better answers. | |
May 5, 2017 at 21:53 | history | asked | Wes Sayeed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |