Timeline for A useful question was put on hold after six years due to software recommentation, how to respond?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2017 at 8:09 | comment | added | starfry | Thanks for the feedback @KamilMaciorowski. That's what I wanted - to make it "on topic" because I felt it was a genuinely useful and worthwhile question. | |
| Jul 11, 2017 at 7:23 | comment | added | Kamil Maciorowski | @starfry I voted to reopen the question after your second edit. The edited question automatically appeared in the reopen queue and I didn't care whether it was old or new, nor what its history was (I haven't seen this meta question until now). I don't know other voters' motivations but if you ask me, the question was reopened because your edit made it on-topic, not because you convinced us here it should be reopened. I think it's good; this is the way it should be. I'm writing this to give feedback on how the site works. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 10:19 | vote | accept | starfry | ||
| Jul 6, 2017 at 10:19 | comment | added | starfry | ok, I've done that. I'll leave it at that. Thanks for your answer. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 10:15 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @starfry It would, but like I said we don't usually bother with such old questions. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 10:14 | comment | added | starfry | So if I edited it to remove that sentence, would that be enough to take it off hold? | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 9:28 | history | answered | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |