Timeline for What happens if an answer has a statement that is false but does not invalidate the answer entirely?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 0:24 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | The example you linked discusses improving a post, which is encouraged. But you must never change a post's meaning, even if you're trying to fix a wrong post. | |
| Jan 29, 2018 at 0:09 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | I don't think that's true. I've seen plenty of times when a useful edit is accepted and even enforced if the original poster actively resists it by rolling it back (example). It may be not a good idea to do such edits before one reaches 2k though. | |
| Jan 28, 2018 at 22:50 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | Edits that clearly conflict with the original poster's intent, even those that correct wrong information, are not acceptable. | |
| Jan 28, 2018 at 22:45 | comment | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | I'd say editing is an option if the user doesn't react to comments within a reasonable time frame. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 12:04 | history | edited | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Jan 17, 2018 at 17:15 | history | edited | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 17, 2018 at 14:21 | vote | accept | DRP | ||
| Jan 17, 2018 at 13:21 | history | answered | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |