Timeline for Informative comments, should they deleted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2018 at 22:54 | comment | added | music2myear | On Meta, votes are the "here here!" and the "boo!" of the community. | |
| Mar 28, 2018 at 11:18 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | @Larnu Votes on Meta sites work differently than on the main sites. Here they signal agreement/disagreement with posts. | |
| Mar 28, 2018 at 8:41 | comment | added | Larnu | Thanks @Blackwood. I think Mokubai has certainly hit the nail on the head here with their answer, which I've accepted. Although I could give an explicit example, he's pretty much covered it well. On a separate note, i'd love to know what the downvotes are for. According to the Votes page, downvotes are for whenever you encounter an egregiously sloppy, no-effort-expended post, or an answer that is clearly and perhaps dangerously incorrect. Perhaps the voters would consider using the comments for constructive feedback? :) | |
| Mar 28, 2018 at 8:33 | vote | accept | Larnu | ||
| Mar 28, 2018 at 8:30 | answer | added | MokubaiMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 27, 2018 at 23:59 | comment | added | Blackwood | I'm not really sure what you are talking about, perhaps some examples would help (if you have examples, please edit your question to include them). I also participate in Stack Overflow, and have not noticed any difference between the way comments are treated there compared to Super User. In all Stack Exchange sites, comments should be regarded as ephemeral, they are not a platform for adding long term information. | |
| Mar 27, 2018 at 19:12 | answer | added | Ramhound | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 27, 2018 at 18:46 | history | asked | Larnu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |