Skip to main content
edited title
Link
DavidPostill Mod
  • 160.2k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 59

Question about structeringstructuring posts

Clarify wording and format quote.
Source Link
Blackwood
  • 3.2k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 10

I would argue that, for the majority, paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this suggested change. But the change was rejected for the following reason: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

"This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume the reason is that it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly disagree with that reason or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

I would argue that for the majority paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this suggested change. But the change was rejected for the following reason: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume the reason is that it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly disagree with that reason or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

I would argue that, for the majority, paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this suggested change. But the change was rejected for the following reason:

"This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume the reason is that it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly disagree with that reason or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

added 190 characters in body
Source Link
Albin
  • 11.3k
  • 11
  • 13

For some people it might not make a difference if a text has no paragraphs but I would argue that for the majority paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this casesuggested change. But the change was rejected for the following reason: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume the reason is that it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly don't disagree with that reason or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

For some people it might not make a difference if a text has no paragraphs but I would argue that for the majority paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this case.

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly don't disagree or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

I would argue that for the majority paragraphs as well as short sentences almost always make it easier to read like in this suggested change. But the change was rejected for the following reason: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Since the change doesn't harm readability I assume the reason is that it "does not make the post even a little bit easier to read". I strongly disagree with that reason or did I overlook anything? Should I redo the suggestion?

Source Link
Albin
  • 11.3k
  • 11
  • 13
Loading