Timeline for Strange audit result
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2019 at 18:22 | history | edited | fixer1234 |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 14, 2019 at 11:41 | answer | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 8, 2019 at 4:38 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @PimpJuiceIT, my impression is that the folks responsible for the audit system view it differently from the average person doing the reviews. It's just part of gamifying the SE sites, and a certain percentage of bad audit questions is a tradeoff for the simplified maintenance of an automated system. As long as there aren't too many bad audit questions, the bad ones have the same effect as the good ones. But reviewers are willing to tolerate only so many "undeserved failures", then we lose reviewers. I suspect they won't want to complicate the system for something that happens only rarely. | |
| Aug 8, 2019 at 3:18 | comment | added | Vomit IT - Chunky Mess Style | Good observation and question... I think whatever is controlling this logic or algorithm is worthy enough to at least be considered for review to make adjustments so these sort of trick audit reviews base a condition on the current status of the question regardless of it's historical property values. Shall we call upon and invite the super mods such @shog, or others at this level to advise to get an actual even somewhat satisfactory answer to this question? Perhaps it's been answered elsewhere or the community could get a peak at the correlated source code to help. | |
| Aug 7, 2019 at 14:33 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | FWIW, it seems that question has only been used for one audit, i.e. the one that you "failed", and that was long after it had been reopened. I really have no idea what happened here. | |
| Aug 4, 2019 at 17:56 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Sorry for making you fail an audit.... | |
| Aug 4, 2019 at 10:58 | history | asked | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |