Timeline for Strange audit result
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2019 at 18:31 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Your FAQ link from Tim Post includes advice to post on the site Meta and include the [disputed-review-audits] tag. That implies that when that FAQ was created, there was a provision for culling bad audit questions. The tag no longer exists, so it looks like a decision was made to not invest human resources in keeping the audit system clean; close enough is good enough. | |
| Aug 14, 2019 at 12:00 | history | edited | Dmitry Grigoryev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2019 at 11:41 | history | answered | Dmitry Grigoryev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |