Timeline for (Accepted) answer to a spam question - bot account?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2019 at 1:03 | comment | added | Robotnik | @gparyani ah, missed that at the end of the sentence there haha. In either case - it's definitely an option to repost it yourself. | |
| Aug 19, 2019 at 0:58 | comment | added | gparyani | @Robotnik Which is why I suggested redacting the spam from the revision history. | |
| Aug 19, 2019 at 0:57 | comment | added | Robotnik | @gparyani - Reverting to the earlier revision and undeleting would still leave the spam info in the revision history. You could instead repost the (original) question yourself if you think it's worth keeping? (Probably clean it up first). You could even reach out to Spiff (who posted the answer) to see if they want to move it across themselves. | |
| Aug 16, 2019 at 20:07 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @gparyani Too late. In any case the OP probably posted it with the intention of adding spam later so question was not posted in good faith. | |
| Aug 16, 2019 at 18:55 | comment | added | gparyani | Since it is a valid question, can't the question be undeleted and the spam be redacted? | |
| Aug 15, 2019 at 18:30 | comment | added | Tetsujin | @fixer1234 - for a true 'interwebz' perspective, it should warm the cookies of your heart. There's certainly nothing like warm cookies ;-)) | |
| Aug 15, 2019 at 17:58 | comment | added | fixer1234 | That warms the cockles of my heart. There's nothing quite like warm cockles. :-) | |
| Aug 15, 2019 at 17:23 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @fixer1234 Spammer has now been nuked. | |
| Aug 15, 2019 at 8:33 | comment | added | Tetsujin | @fixer1234 I would have thought the spam deletion & -8 rep would auto-generate some kind of at least temp ban. I've seen bans posted as banners on user account profiles before now, but maybe that's a 20/25k rep feature. I'm only 18k on this stack. | |
| Aug 14, 2019 at 22:35 | comment | added | fixer1234 | The community took care of the post, but the OP has 1 rep, so was unaffected by the 100 pt rep penalty. They are clearly here just to cause mischief and to spam their "services". Wouldn't it be appropriate to apply some kind of sanction (like account termination, or at least suspension)? | |
| Aug 14, 2019 at 19:32 | vote | accept | Albin | ||
| Aug 14, 2019 at 19:28 | history | answered | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |