Skip to main content
added 367 characters in body
Source Link
Journeyman Geek Mod
  • 132k
  • 2
  • 76
  • 165

We've been using the status tags - things like were used for 'internal' SU moderation tasks. At some point, review tags on per site meta get fed into tickets internally.

I feel like a set of tags with the 'same' uses - review, deferred, rejected and completed for MSU moderation and meta moderation tasks would be useful - we wouldn't be stepping on staff toes and it might be an impetus to give a fresh look to stuff we've admittedly let get backlogged like tag removals and such.

Would sound like a good idea or do y'all have suggestions for what to call these?

Advantages here would be

  • it lets us separate things that need our attention from staff attention

  • its an opportunity to try to chew on the backlog a little

  • we can use these tags to filter tasks to do

  • we're not stuck with the standard set. I feel like an for example would be nice for longer term things

We've been using the status tags - things like were used for 'internal' SU moderation tasks. At some point, review tags on per site meta get fed into tickets internally.

I feel like a set of tags with the 'same' uses - review, deferred, rejected and completed for MSU moderation and meta moderation tasks would be useful - we wouldn't be stepping on staff toes and it might be an impetus to give a fresh look to stuff we've admittedly let get backlogged like tag removals and such.

Would sound like a good idea or do y'all have suggestions for what to call these?

We've been using the status tags - things like were used for 'internal' SU moderation tasks. At some point, review tags on per site meta get fed into tickets internally.

I feel like a set of tags with the 'same' uses - review, deferred, rejected and completed for MSU moderation and meta moderation tasks would be useful - we wouldn't be stepping on staff toes and it might be an impetus to give a fresh look to stuff we've admittedly let get backlogged like tag removals and such.

Would sound like a good idea or do y'all have suggestions for what to call these?

Advantages here would be

  • it lets us separate things that need our attention from staff attention

  • its an opportunity to try to chew on the backlog a little

  • we can use these tags to filter tasks to do

  • we're not stuck with the standard set. I feel like an for example would be nice for longer term things

Source Link
Journeyman Geek Mod
  • 132k
  • 2
  • 76
  • 165

Pondering mod status tags

We've been using the status tags - things like were used for 'internal' SU moderation tasks. At some point, review tags on per site meta get fed into tickets internally.

I feel like a set of tags with the 'same' uses - review, deferred, rejected and completed for MSU moderation and meta moderation tasks would be useful - we wouldn't be stepping on staff toes and it might be an impetus to give a fresh look to stuff we've admittedly let get backlogged like tag removals and such.

Would sound like a good idea or do y'all have suggestions for what to call these?