Timeline for Requesting guidance on the use of backtick formatting with manpage names
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14 at 13:14 | answer | added | grawity | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 14 at 1:13 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Nov 13 at 6:02 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Well yes. But I wanted to take a look at it with fresh eyes and forgot 😅 | |
| Nov 13 at 5:06 | comment | added | Robotnik | I agree the edit is fine. @JourneymanGeek - as a mod, you have the ability to override reviews in cases such as these 😉 | |
| Nov 12 at 18:49 | history | edited | AJM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo (fron/from)
|
| Nov 12 at 18:48 | vote | accept | AJM | ||
| Nov 12 at 17:43 | answer | added | Canadian Luke | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 11 at 13:37 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | There's 2 rejects and one approval - which isn't that bad. I do think its deeply subjective, and its a matter of if one sees it as a minor edit or not. I'd say broadly its fine as an edit on its own, but as a suggested edit, whether its substancial enough, well depends on how the reviewer sees it | |
| Nov 11 at 13:15 | history | asked | AJM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |