Timeline for Is discussion of techniques for removing DRM permitted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Nov 16, 2014 at 9:24 | history | edited | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixing typo
|
| Mar 19, 2011 at 23:00 | comment | added | Moab | There is a new Sheriff in town and the name is studiohack! ;-> | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 21:41 | vote | accept | Jeremy | ||
| Mar 17, 2011 at 20:18 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 163 | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 15:52 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | Somewhat related -> meta.security.stackexchange.com/questions/117/… | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 15:08 | comment | added | Jeremy | I have added a quote of the relevant section and a link to that section in the context of the rest of the law. | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 15:07 | history | edited | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
adding legal reference
|
| Mar 17, 2011 at 13:24 | comment | added | James Mertz | To better back up your question, I suggest posting links backing up your claim of how this is "not illegal" | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 12:12 | answer | added | Randy Orrison | timeline score: 27 | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 10:09 | answer | added | Pylsa | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 6:24 | comment | added | studiohack Mod | this is generally discouraged, but we don't have an official policy on this, so we're hoping your question will firm it up one way or another. +1 for a good Meta question! | |
| Mar 17, 2011 at 6:20 | history | asked | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |