Timeline for Why was this question closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 29, 2011 at 9:16 | vote | accept | wnrph | ||
| Mar 29, 2011 at 9:09 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 29, 2011 at 9:08 | answer | added | Sathyajith BhatMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 29, 2011 at 8:43 | comment | added | wnrph | @Sathya Yes it says posts mustn't be related to websites or web services. But it does not say posts also mustn't appear to be so. (Note the difference between appearing and actually being.) | |
| Mar 29, 2011 at 8:37 | comment | added | wnrph | I've even explicitly asked for command line accessible documentation. It is clearly not a question about websites. ... If you're interested in what it is actually related to, please read the post. | |
| Mar 29, 2011 at 8:36 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod |
and it is not about … websites or web services - says the FAQ
|
|
| Mar 29, 2011 at 8:26 | comment | added | wnrph | They should mention this in the faq: Never let your post appear it has anything to do with websites. Maybe one should always add a disclaimer like "This post is not related to websites. If you're interested in what it is actually related to, please read the post." | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 17:27 | history | edited | Supercereal |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 13:35 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | the question seems more like is there a website for documentation than anything | |
| Mar 27, 2011 at 23:33 | history | asked | wnrph | CC BY-SA 2.5 |