Timeline for Legal basis for restriction of discussions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Apr 1, 2011 at 15:47 | answer | added | Mormegil | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 31, 2011 at 22:53 | history | edited | Kez | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo
|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 23:11 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | is there some actual question on SU that you can provide as a link? Not sure what is being asked here without links to.. something | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 22:19 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 20:51 | comment | added | Bobby | I can't really understand your question. Do you ask why such topics could be a problem, if such topics could be a problem or what could happen to SE if caught with them? | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 20:25 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | Simple: we don't want discussions, we want questions and provide answers. So we close anything that isn't | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 19:57 | comment | added | Moab | Its all based on legal "risk", an most do not want to risk the wrath of a large corporation and its litigation army. Somewhat about reputation also. | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 19:10 | answer | added | Gilles | timeline score: -1 | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 18:58 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | superuser.com/legal | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 18:51 | history | migrated | from superuser.com (revisions) | ||
| Mar 28, 2011 at 18:49 | history | asked | user60598 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |