Timeline for How specific should tags get? e.g., [3tb-hard-drive] vs [hard-drive]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2011 at 20:24 | comment | added | Troggy Mod | I am with Jeff, Sathya, and nkinkle on this one. hard-drive is the way to go. | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 14:56 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod |
Just go with hard-drive.
|
|
| Jun 16, 2011 at 14:42 | comment | added | Shinrai | Would not a GPT tag be in order here, though? EDIT: Scratch that, it already has one lol. I think that tag is sufficient! | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 12:30 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | I agree with Sathya, nobody will ever use or search for these tags... | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 12:26 | comment | added | DMA57361 Mod | @Sathya, frankly in this case I'm not really sure this question is even worth keeping (it feels list-of), so I agree that any type of "largeHDD" tag is not really useful here anyway. But, I can see a viable question where a hard-drive being too large is he source of a real problem and this then making some sense (although I doubt this'll be a frequent occurrence). | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 12:18 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | if you ask me hard-drive is sufficient | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 12:17 | comment | added | mindless.panda | But then large-hard-drive loses its significance as well as its mapping to >2tb once we jump to 128bit computing? I think large-hard-drive is the best option for now. | |
| Jun 16, 2011 at 12:13 | history | answered | DMA57361Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |