Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 23, 2011 at 16:20 comment added richard "What the hell kind of 'question' has more than 30 possible answers" is the wrong question. The right question is, "How many answers does it take before someone gets the right answer, or one that satisfies the asker? And I think the answer to that is, it depends.
Jul 22, 2010 at 17:57 history migrated from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Jul 29, 2009 at 2:56 comment added jerryjvl Sometimes a question may be difficult to answer though... what if it genuinely takes 10 / 15 / 30 / whatever answers before someone comes up with a satisfactory answer? I agree that doing this is probably the lesser of two evils, but to categorically say it cannot happen is a bit dogmatic.
Jul 18, 2009 at 6:23 comment added Jeff Atwood what the hell kind of "question" has more than 30 possible answers? Seriously think about that for a minute. The line between "valid question" and "subjective discussion" is quite obvious to me -- the latter has a ZILLION 'answers'
Jul 18, 2009 at 6:03 comment added waffles @TheTXI, then make it reversible with a higher level reps being allowed to vote to unwiki. (which my poor old logviewer question would benefit from). the retroactive rep removal, would be a contentious feature, but I think its required if you want to cut down on these questions
Jul 18, 2009 at 5:58 comment added TheTXI Sam Saffron: I don't know if I would set a limit that low. One thing you have to remember is the fact that once something goes CW, it can't come back (or at least I have never seen a method even on the moderator side to flip it back). It's not like closing where you can vote to close and reopen indefinitely.
Jul 18, 2009 at 5:55 comment added waffles +1 for vote to wiki, just allow anyone with more than 100 rep to vot-to-wiki, after 5 votes turn it to a wiki and retroactively remove the rep gain.
Jul 18, 2009 at 5:35 history answered TheTXI CC BY-SA 2.5