Timeline for How do you ignore a certain user on Super User?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 11, 2011 at 15:04 | comment | added | DMA57361 Mod | @Zds - people who aren't coherent aren't welcome; each incoherent question can and should be closed (and so we need people to see these questions and close them - if you can't vote to close yet, then please feel free to flag to close). Those users that don't answer enquiries usually are one-shot visitors anyway, so ignoring them doesn't help you (because they're not coming back anyway). | |
| Aug 11, 2011 at 12:08 | comment | added | Zds | And because this is matter of personal preference, and different people have different things that annoy them, user-per-user ignore is good way to go. | |
| Aug 11, 2011 at 12:07 | comment | added | Zds | When being on forum where everyone can ask questions the people who are incoherent or don't answer to further inquiries reduce my willingness to follow that forum at all. Just making them non-visible on my end still lets others to help them, but also makes me more willing (and able!) to help the people who behave in reasonable manner. | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 16:43 | comment | added | Randolf Richardson | I agree (+1) because an "ignore" option is an anti-social feature that leads to invisible divisions in the the community that won't make sense to those who don't know who's ignoring whom in addition to causing the formation of cliques. The "plonk" feature in usenet newsgroups (NNTP) has lead to this very problem, and has actually made it worse in my opinion because the trouble-makers just return with a different identity (to take a page out of a spammer's handbook). One of the functions of a moderator is obviously to quell such disorder, and for a few instances I know of it was handled well. | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 12:10 | history | answered | DMA57361Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |