Timeline for Why do we start off with one rep?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:56 | comment | added | Simon Verbeke | We could also see this as receiving a rep point for joining ;) | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 21:45 | history | edited | Supercereal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2011 at 5:49 | answer | added | Sathyajith BhatMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 4:20 | history | edited | wizlog | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 29, 2011 at 4:20 | comment | added | wizlog | @iglvzx Heehee... SE is large and important enough to set the standard, not just follow it. | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 4:19 | comment | added | iglvzx | Zero-based indexing. Jokes aside, I figured starting at 1 reputation point was based on tradition. Many sites start off new users with 1 point. | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 4:08 | comment | added | wizlog | ? I don't understand what you mean? | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 4:06 | comment | added | iglvzx | Starting at 0 would still be starting at '1' ;) | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 3:41 | history | asked | wizlog | CC BY-SA 3.0 |