Timeline for The silent tag... dismember and burninate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 8, 2012 at 14:58 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @DanielBeck regardless of rep, people do stupid stuff. Also, feel free to raise a blacklist request. Mods can't blacklist and devs have made it clear in the past that blacklists are rarely applied | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 14:56 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod |
@Sathya If that were an effective requirement, we wouldn't have all that crap around, especially not tags that were just deleted. [apple] comes to mind.
|
|
Feb 8, 2012 at 14:17 | comment | added | slhck | … but we still find useless tags every week? Somebody with enough rep must have created them. | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 13:12 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @DanielBeck tag creation requires a bit of rep. | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 13:10 | comment | added | slhck |
In the long term, given the fact that we still have so many stupid tags, none really. I guess it would make sense to request to blacklist the really stupid ones right away instead of only removing them. So maybe we should clarify this for every new [retag-request] , like you just did here. @DanielBeck
|
|
Feb 8, 2012 at 12:19 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | What possible use is deletion if the tag just reappears days later? | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 12:00 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | well the request is for burnination aka tag delete, not blacklist @DanielBeck | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 11:59 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Yep and tomorrow someone else will add it to a question. We really should blacklist it. | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 11:58 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | @DanielBeck system'll auto delete the tag in few hours | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 11:57 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | A proper burnination would prevent it from reappearing though. | |
Feb 8, 2012 at 11:54 | history | answered | Sathyajith BhatMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |