Timeline for Disambiguating or burninating the [movies] tag
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 at 9:50 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 198 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2012 at 9:24 | comment | added | slhck |
@Rebecca Can you give me an example of what question would be poorly tagged without [movies]? I went through them three times now.
|
|
| Mar 5, 2012 at 3:50 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff Mod | There seem to be questions that would be rather poorly tagged if [movies] was erased. Down to about 50 questions, perhaps someone could take a look? | |
| Feb 26, 2012 at 12:44 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 25, 2012 at 21:04 | comment | added | slhck | @DanielBeck I didn't remove the tag from all 95 questions manually – who would do that cough cough! I just fixed the ones that would have bad tags after a possible burnination. | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 20:13 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Tags are auto-deleted when unused after a while. | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 18:52 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 178 characters in body
|
| Feb 25, 2012 at 7:06 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | I'm for nuking the tag | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 0:51 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 25, 2012 at 0:13 | comment | added | Simon Sheehan | I particularly like the bolded part of this post. | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 22:17 | history | asked | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |