Timeline for Question and suggestion on Votes and Rep
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2012 at 15:24 | vote | accept | Carl B | ||
| Sep 16, 2012 at 21:42 | comment | added | Carl B | +1 and +1 for your insite and follow up. | |
| Sep 16, 2012 at 21:40 | answer | added | Carl B | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 16, 2012 at 20:55 | comment | added | slhck Mod | I often find myself in situations where it's not always easy to evaluate whether a question really shows enough research effort, or is particularly useful. It's for those reasons some questions are also being downvoted too, of course. If you lack specific expertise in an area, you might not want to vote. At least that's my most plausible explanation. | |
| Sep 16, 2012 at 20:42 | comment | added | Carl B | @slhck - helpful and that stats are understood. But as one answer decribes with 2 parts, part 2 "They are already capable of voting, but not sure on the topic matter and do not want to cast a vote in an area they're not confident in or they're not able to test the validity of an answer". I understand not upvoting an answer if uncertain, but the question? | |
| Sep 15, 2012 at 7:27 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Sep 15, 2012 at 6:26 | comment | added | slhck Mod | See also: Why don't people upvote when browsing the site? | |
| Sep 15, 2012 at 5:51 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited tags
|
| Sep 15, 2012 at 4:11 | history | asked | Carl B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |