Timeline for Trying to reach 200 rep, then this bogus? edit rejection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 26, 2012 at 16:27 | comment | added | slhck Mod | @Sathya The 100 rep association bonus was just added today. | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 7:32 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | to note you're not quite close 200 superuser.com/users/155990/zero2cx?tab=reputation | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 7:21 | comment | added | Nifle | Yep - I tend to do that (especially on relatively new questions), but I get no rep from doing it. | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 7:18 | comment | added | zero2cx | @Nifle Okay, thanks. You did submit/accept the near identical and even more minor edit you yourself made, though. | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 7:08 | comment | added | Nifle | My bad - The reject reason was supposed to be "too minor" I was simultaneously reviewing edits elsewhere. | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:50 | answer | added | zero2cx | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:27 | answer | added | nhinkleMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:14 | history | asked | zero2cx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |