Timeline for When should I flag something as "very low quality"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2013 at 13:07 | history | edited | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 281 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 6:17 | comment | added | slhck Mod | @TFM It attempts to answer the question, saying what worked for them to solve the problem (as they saw it). So it shouldn't be flagged as that: When is an answer eligible to be flagged as “not an answer”? What to do? | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 6:14 | comment | added | TFM |
What about flagging it as not an answer? I know, it answers something (that the options provided didn't work for him/her), but that's rather a comment, and not an answer.
|
|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 2:07 | vote | accept | BenjiWiebe | ||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 23:05 | comment | added | slhck Mod | Correct. We don't have too many users capable of doing so, but it does happen. Also note that there are badges for deleting your own negatively scored post. Granted, it's unlikely the poster of this answer will ever return, but they probably had a reason to come here and share a solution that worked for them. | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 22:57 | comment | added | cpast | If it has negative rep, I believe high-rep users can vote to delete after some time (so it doesn't continue to clutter up the question). | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 22:54 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |